That seems a rather odd claim. We've been very straightforward in our plans for updating these docs every step of the way, including by suggesting to the WG which ones needed to be updated, calling to adopt their update, asking for volunteers to do so, etc. Jason On 10/20/18, 5:27 PM, "iasa20 on behalf of John C Klensin" <iasa20-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: Frankly, the only good reason I can see for generating all of these IASA2 documents just to change terminology is to create enough noise that the community doesn't notice and pay attention to changes that actually might be controversial. I trust and assume that is not the intent of anyone involved. john _______________________________________________ iasa20 mailing list iasa20@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20