Re: [Anima] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you Michael.
Seems that we are good.
Yours,
Joel

On 8/17/18 10:36 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Joel Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
     >     Does section 3.3.2 intend to mandate that devices have persistent
     > storage for the LDevID?  Or is it trying to say that on power cycle it
     > stays in Enrolled state if it retains its LDevID, but goes back to the
     > Factory default state if not?  (Given that folks have repeatedly said
     > that these may be low power devices, I think we need to be clear about
     > what we are requiring.)

*) Constrained devices are not, in general, in scope for the WG
*) Regardless, the LDevID needs to be persisted, and I agree we should say that.

     >     Section 5 starts by saying that the administrator does not have to
     > configure security.  In the very next paragraph it says that a PKI must
     > be in place.  That clearly requires configuring some security
     > properties.  Please reword.

The administrator has to have a PKI.  We considered making the PKI
auto-configuring, but we backed out of that as a hard requirement.
I agree that this text need to be clarified.

     >     Section 3.3.2 in defining when a device is in the Enrolled state
     > says that it in the Enrolled state if it has an LDevID.  As far as I
     > can tell, the added constraint is that it is not currently a member of
     > an ACP.  The text should include that.

Agreed.

     >     The third paragraph of section 6.1 refers to the Autonomic nodes
     > and the ASAs as "self-aware".  I do not know what meaning is being
     > ascribed to that phrase.  The usage does not seem to correspond to any
     > meaning I can understood.  Can we just remove the sentence?  (I suspect
     > that the intention is to lead to the fact that the functions can
     > advertise their capabilities, and negotiate them.  We don't need the
     > sentence as grounding for that.)

I think that the intent is to say that the ASA will have a model of itself.
I think that it would be better to say that.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-





_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux