On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 04:19:41PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > All this means is that draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis should note it updates > RFC 7950 in the header and abstract... I think there are different interpretations what the Updates: header means. And in this case, the "update" is even conditional, i.e., you have to implement rfc7895bis if you do implement NMDA - but if you don't, then rfc7895 still works just fine. > Your read of the update to RFC7950 is that it should now reference > rfc7895bis in Section 5.6.4. Is that correct? How is that different > from 7895bis obsoleting 7895, and thus all references to 7895 should > now be to 7895bis? It is conditional to the implementation of NMDA. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
