Re: [ot] Re: thank you

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ot] Re: thank you
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:10:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAA=duU0593Pv3eo1mWGwZA=+VjgHckk3eR2STmxMyY15spdg3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <24BFE99D-2A12-459E-9769-2FC33A7242F6@gmail.com> <CAHBU6is6nskekdYqLRJF1SRoA4KLqGgJ992p8Jf02Op7VrQFdw@mail.gmail.com> <20694c4d-b449-c851-52a5-a48d5641806c@mcgrail.com> <CAA=duU0593Pv3eo1mWGwZA=+VjgHckk3eR2STmxMyY15spdg3w@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

Hi folks,

Just a reminder: this is the IETF discussion list, not a grammar workshop
or argument clinic [1].  So it'd be best to let this thread finish
gracefully.

-Ben

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_Clinic

References:
- thank you
  - From: Aaron Falk
- Re: thank you
  - From: Tim Bray
- [ot] Re: thank you
  - From: Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: [ot] Re: thank you
  - From: Andrew G. Malis

Prev by Date: Re: [ot] Re: thank you
Next by Date: Re: The question on jabber to IESG at 102 meeting (not answered)
Previous by thread: Re: [ot] Re: thank you
Next by thread: Question for the IETF... How are people supposed to verify the IETF's assumptions?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux