On Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:24:40 -0700, Shivan Kaul Sahib said: > The intention of the draft asking for resource identification in the legal > demand was *not* to say that the resource has to be named - like I said, > the Vatican example was fine. Unfortunately, that's not my reading of this text: > "HTTP 451 SHOULD NOT be used by an operator to deny access to a resource on > the basis of a legal demand that is not specific to the requested resource. A legal request to block "anything from East Wombat" isn't specific to the requested resource. It may cover that resource, and 38,915 other resources. If a news item saying "all people in <insert town you are in> should seek immediate shelter from an oncoming tornado", would you call that *specific to you* (which it isn't, as it covers every other person in the town as well), or merely *applicable* to you? That's why I suggested "not applicable to the requested resource".
Attachment:
pgpHwCSIWc9z8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
