Dave, Thank you a lot for your thorough review. I have replied in the PDF document (accepted all the editorial ones, and suggested some resolutions to the inconsistent or ambiguous terminologies). I believe all the issues are solved, but please check the appended document. Best regards, Yuanlong -----Original Message----- From: Dave Thaler [mailto:dthaler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 5:59 AM To: int-dir@xxxxxxxx Cc: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; tictoc@xxxxxxxx Subject: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07 Reviewer: Dave Thaler Review result: Ready with Nits I have reviewed draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07 as assigned int-dir reviewer. The draft was readable and technically good (though I am not an expert on either YANG or IEEE 1588-2008. I do have a number of nits indicated in the marked up copy at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2018/06/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07.pdf The most notable piece of feedback is that it's not clear what the units are for several integer objects. Dave
Attachment:
draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07.pdf
Description: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07.pdf
