Magnus,
Thanks for the review. I will await direction from the shepherding
AD as to when he would like to see this change made.
Regards,
Brian
On 6/11/18 8:49 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Reviewer: Magnus Westerlund
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> This is a follow up to the previous review:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04-tsvart-lc-westerlund-2018-04-04/
>
> Thanks for resolving the previously raised issues.
>
> I did notice in Section 4.1 that the following paragraph:
>
> The Block Size will interact with the MTU size. Especially for
> length values that are a large fraction of the MTU, unless the block
> length is chosen so that a multiple just fits into the MTU, Block
> Length Padding may cause unneccessary fragmentation for UDP based
> delivery. Also, chosing a block length larger than the MTU of course
> forces to always fragment.
>
> Is repeated with just one paragraph between them.
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
