Reviewer: Magnus Westerlund Review result: Ready with Nits This is a follow up to the previous review: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04-tsvart-lc-westerlund-2018-04-04/ Thanks for resolving the previously raised issues. I did notice in Section 4.1 that the following paragraph: The Block Size will interact with the MTU size. Especially for length values that are a large fraction of the MTU, unless the block length is chosen so that a multiple just fits into the MTU, Block Length Padding may cause unneccessary fragmentation for UDP based delivery. Also, chosing a block length larger than the MTU of course forces to always fragment. Is repeated with just one paragraph between them.
