Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > You are right, it does not matter for those who attend both meetings
    > anyways (like me). 

    > However, it may matter for those who only come for one of the
    > meetings. Some may not get approval for too many additional dates or
    > may cannot do it for private reasons.

Seems a strawman to me.

    > As for a DetNet - TSN - IEC workshop, we had a Chicago rule straw poll
    > on the possible dates at the last week 802.1 Interim to get a feeling
    > on the interest. Clearly, there is a significant interest for the
    > workshop. The poll showed that most of the TSN + IEC participants would
    > attend if the workshop was on Sunday, Nov 11. The numbers fall to 52%
    > and to 32% of that of Sunday if the workshop was on Saturday, Nov 10 or
    > Friday, Nov 9, respectively.

Sounds to me that the IEEE attendees do not want to arrive early.


-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
	

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux