Re: Visibility of current RFC Maturity Levels (and how they got there (was: Re: Last Call: Moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406, RFC 4407 (Sender-ID) to Historic)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Tom.

>> Well, if people are really going to the .txt files on rfc-editor.org,
>> then nothing we do in the process of changing an RFC's status will
>> help them, and it doesn't matter whether we use "obsoletes" or not.
>
> I do indeed go to the underlying .txt files, every week - rfc-index.txt!
> It is so much easier to search, to navigate than HTML.  And it tells me
> the Status.

I was referring to using the .txt files for the RFCs; yes, the index
contains the status.  But if you go directly to, say, rfc3540.txt, it
won't tell you that it's Historic.

b




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux