On 10/05/18 03:14, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Therefore, I would like again to propose that we go back to the > previous text -- +1 While the previous text is somewhat more vague, there is the expectation that the community be informed of any likely exceptions/issues asap, so I think it's as good as trying to be specific about some inevitably incomplete subset of things about which we may care. S.
Attachment:
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
