RE: [art] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sure, will add this clarification in the next revision.

Cheers,

Andrei

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 6:04 PM
To: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Matthew A. Miller <linuxwolf+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; art@xxxxxxxx
Cc: unbearable@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [art] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12

On 5/8/18 7:17 PM, Andrei Popov wrote:
> Application-specific clients and servers (custom apps) can reject 
> connections without TB, or they can implement a variety of other 
> measures when TB is not negotiated (e.g., issue shorter-lived tokens, 
> require stronger authentication, ...)


If I read Matthew's request correctly, all he is asking is that you add words to the document that say exactly what you say above. Right now, the implication in the document is that the client is required to continue to use the connection as if nothing is wrong.

/a





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux