Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05
From: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:45:09 -0400
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@xxxxxxxx>, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis.all@xxxxxxxx, IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <152482849638.5933.11114167602347254978@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <152482849638.5933.11114167602347254978@ietfa.amsl.com>

These are references to ASN.1 definitions, so they should not be changed as indicated.

Russ

On Apr 27, 2018, at 7:28 AM, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Section 2.3: CertificateSet --> Certificate Set

Section 4.4.1: basicConstraints --> basic Constraints

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05
  - From: Ines Robles

References:
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05
  - From: Ines Robles

Prev by Date: Re: [pim] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-yang-12
Next by Date: Re: Planned changes to registration payments & deadlines
Previous by thread: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05
Next by thread: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux