Hi Suresh, The proposed text works for me. Regards Roni -----Original Message----- From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 2:28 AM To: Roni Even Cc: mtgvenue@xxxxxxxx; gen-art@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy.all@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04 Hi Roni, Thanks for your comments. Please find responses inline. > On Apr 15, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2018-04-15 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-19 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-10 > > Summary: > The document is ready for publication as BCP with nits > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. I was wondering what is the process for selecting exploratory > meeting site comparing to sites according to the regular 1-1-1 policy > (who make the proposal, where is it discussed). The > draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process does not mention the > exploratory meeting site. I proposed the following text in response to Russ’s comment on the same topic. "The timing and frequency of such exploratory meetings in the future will be based on IETF consensus as determined by the IETF chair” Does that work for you? > > 2. In section 2 "BACKGROUND NOTE:The" missing space. Will fix. Regards Suresh _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
