I was looking for the ANIMA, IETF-90 (Toronto) slides. IETF91 was the earliest... aha, it was a BOF in Toronto... and finally I realized it was called UCAN when it was a BOF. Is there some reason why we do not keep the same database entry so that BOF materials that lead to a WG can be seen on the materials and agenda page for the WG? If there is some reason the same entry is not kept, is there some pointer on the WG status page that points to the BOF that I've missed?
-- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
