Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> See also my other notes.
> 
> I believe that what the document tries to say is:
> 
> Register R is divided into four different ranges R1, R2, R3, R4 (defining
> the value limits may be useful)
> 
> Values in range R1 are allocated according to policy P1 in the case that ...
> Values in range R2 are allocated according to policy P2 in the case that ...
> Values in range R3 are allocated according to policy P3 in the case that ...
> Values in range R4 are allocated according to policy P4 in the case that ...
> 
> But it doesn't say it. Mentioning four concurrent policies for the same
> registry without separation of values range, and without providing clear
> instructions when each policy is recommended to be used, seems confusing to
> me, and may be confusing for users of this document in the future.

I agree, and such a change is slated to be in the next rev of the
document.  Sorry for spending so much text to be in violent
agreement...

-Ben




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux