On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 02:06:31PM -0800, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote a message of 38 lines which said: > The IESG has received a request from the Interactive Connectivity > Establishment WG (ice) to consider the following document: - 'Trickle ICE: > Incremental Provisioning of Candidates for the > Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Protocol' > <draft-ietf-ice-trickle-16.txt> as Proposed Standard It may seem a detail, but we already have something named Trickle, in RFC 6206. Is this name collision a good idea?