Hi Alissa, On 30.01.18 16:54, Alissa Cooper wrote: >>> 'It is anticipated that >>> those roles will evolve. The IASA MUST keep the >>> community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating >>> this memo.' >> I don't think the MUST significantly changes the meaning, so I'm ambivalent about the change. Since this text was put in to address a comment in AD Evaluation, I'm inclined to hear from Alissa. > Perhaps the concern could be addressed by saying “without first updating this memo”? The point I raised is that this document shouldn’t gate the ability for the roles to change, but certainly if they do change the document should be updated (or obsoleted by a new document) to match the reality. > Editorially I don't think there is a full sentence that we want to add to capture this. The IASA is not responsible for this document, and I don't think we want to make them responsible for it. The community is responsible. Therefore, I suggest we run with Dan's text that simply requires the IASA to keep the community informed of changes in a timely fashion, and trust that the IASA will find the right means to do so. Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature