Thanks. I posted version 08 just now that includes some text suggested by Toerless. How well this scales is probably the most important part of the experiment. I agree we do not know the applicability at this point. Stig On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Jaeggli > Review result: Has Nits > > Greetings, > > I reviewed this draft on behalf of the OPS directorate for operational > considerations. > > I think this draft is largely ready to go. Toerless had some comments during > last call against draft-07 which are worthy of inclusion. In particular, The > distinction between BSR (rfc 5059) although pointed out in the introduction is > important enough that it should be captured in the title. > > >From my general understanding of the mechanism there are probably limitations > to how well ti apprach scales which limits it's applicability to large pim > domains. The experimental status is therefore quite appropriate. It represents > significant improvement over dense mode pim so in the sense that it offers the > opportunity for significantly lower coordination/signaling requirements without > the destructive nature of flooding and then pruning the source traffic. it is > quite appropriate to proceed to experimental status. When we move on from that > I would be willing to bet that applicability will need to be refined > accordingly. >