Thanks, Andrew
IMHO, that type of setup is not well suited to minimize the amount of traffic
about web page issues on this mailing list or the amount of issues raised
with webmaster. And it also does not provide the transparency that the IETF
should have for at least this type of issues. Especially not the transparency
into the amount of effort spent by the folks working on the issues. Loose-loose.
Cheers
Toerles
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:02:14PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> When I sent a note about an issue to webmaster@xxxxxxxx, as Russ asked
> we do, I got an RT response. So it appears that the usual RT system
> is tracking these things. My recollection is that RT -- or anyway the
> IETF deployment -- does not provide anonymous web access to tickets,
> so you'd need an RT account to see the tickets.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:57:30PM +0100, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > Is there any issue-tracker tool for the www.ietf.org redesign,
> > and if so, where on www.ietf.org would i find a link to it ?
> >
> > I hope the issue tracker also has a way to read up on all
> > existing (open) issues and +1 those that are of concern to me to
> > help the developers prioritize issues voted up by most users of the site.
> >
> > Sorry if there is one, and i can not remember or not find it. I did raise
> > my issues with the redesign during last IETF and specifically wrt. to the
> > issue of not knowing if/where there is an issue tracker i think to
> > remember there was none back then.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Toerless
> >
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
---
tte@xxxxxxxxx