Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:45:31 -0400
Cc: huitema@xxxxxxxxxxx, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5E1A09B2-B139-417F-8D21-29C1FC9049EB@frobbit.se>
References: <20170923151547.7163.qmail@ary.lan> <5E1A09B2-B139-417F-8D21-29C1FC9049EB@frobbit.se>

On Sep 23, 2017, at 12:36 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Can not whoever develops _javascript_ develop some correct libraries for usage of domain names?

Or if not, code to do validation without having to implement all the crypto code in interpreted _javascript_?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Adam Roach
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Patrik Fältström

References:
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: John Levine
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Patrik Fältström

Prev by Date: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Next by Date: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Previous by thread: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Next by thread: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]