Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

To: Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
From: Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:28:48 +0200
Cc: doh@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a34c98e2-7129-1d1a-947b-20cafa236119@nostrum.com>
References: <150549029332.2975.12341647131707994474.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170920151458.GA22670@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <eaadc24d-6150-2396-64b6-708266de1c69@nostrum.com> <c06bfd5a-743a-aa9f-68b4-4a60badc8bed@cisco.com> <a34c98e2-7129-1d1a-947b-20cafa236119@nostrum.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

You still don't have a reasonable answer for discovery.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Mark Nottingham

References:
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Toerless Eckert
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Adam Roach
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Adam Roach