Stewart, These Shakespearean style addresses are conventionally used in XMPP XEPs, and I followed that style here. I've discussed with XMPP colleagues, and we agree that although the convention is cool, you are right that a safe address should be used. I have fixed this in 06, which I just submitted Regards Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 20 September 2017 11:56 > To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Genart last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05 > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for > the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05 > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2017-09-20 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-27 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: A well written document, however it uses an example email > address that might be allocated in the future, rather than one for the > example range. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > "romeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx representing a user) " > > That is a really cool example! However I can imagine .lit eventually being > allocated so we ought to use one of the RFC6761 example TLDs. > > Nits/editorial comments: None >