Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-09-19 20:35, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx <mailto:julian.reschke@xxxxxx>> wrote:
Can you please point to *something* that says it's wrong to use the BOM in UTF-8 encoded documents of type text/plain?

It's pretty clearly wrong to download a document that's labeled "text/plain;charset=utf8" and then store it in a way that will result in it being treated as having a different encoding, or to display it directly using a different encoding, as Explorer does.   Since the BOM is not required or even encouraged by the Unicode Consortium, failing to get this right is clearly a bug.

I'm pretty sure that if the browser modified the downloaded file, somebody else would claim that *that* would be a big. For instance, it would affect signatures.

Best regards, Julian




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]