Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?

Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> · Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:23:24 -0500



    On 9/18/17 15:15, Ted Lemon wrote:

    
      On Sep 18, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
      wrote:
      
        
          Do we? Can you cite something
              that makes this claim under color of consensus?

          
      See Page 36, the paragraph after the table: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.0.0/ch02.pdf
      

    Sorry, I meant IETF consensus. I'm not going to cite specific
      examples (no point poking a hornet's nest in this conversation),
      but I believe that there are some places where the Unicode
      consortium and the IETF have reached mutually incompatible
      conclusions on certain issues.
    /a