> On 14. Aug 2017, at 22:02, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > Hi Stewart, thanks for your review. See my comment in-line. Best regards Michael > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12 > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2017-08-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-25 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This is a well written draft and is ready for publication. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > You repeat the text: > > "A message is considered in flight, if at least on of its I-DATA chunks is not > acknowledged in a non-renegable way" in two consecutive sections, maybe a > common definition could be used. The first text covers "Message in flight", the second covers "Fragment in flight". What is duplicated is the text (i.e. acknowledged by the cumulative TSN Ack) for explaining "acknowledged in a non-renegable way". Giving the explanation only once improves readability, I guess. Best regards Michael >
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>