On Jul 28, 2017, at 5:50 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is a good point. Arguably, we should use a different SSID every IETF. E.g., ietf-100 instead of ietf. We're already proposing to do that for ietf-legacy so that people don't automatically associate with that ssid. So if ietf goes away in favor of ietf-100, and ietf-hotel becomes ietf-100-hotel (or something like that), then would that address your objection? |