Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Maybe what we need is not more virtual interims, but more time boxes.
> This would do nothing for controversy that needs rapid interaction,
> but it might meet the test of "faster progress".
Can you explain "time boxes" here?
> One way to do that would be to set document sprint dates in advance,
> and for chairs to reserve discussion of this or that other topic at
> ome time. Have any WGs tried this recently?
This sounds a bit like a design team meeting to me.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature