On 30/04/2017 14:10, Brandon Long wrote:
> It sounds like there would be benefit to fixing the mailman to not consider
> policy bounces as unsub worthy, at least.
Possibly. For now I've increased the bounce threshold on the list, but
that is hardly a solution. (It isn't an unsub, just delivery suspension,
but that's still a problem for all concerned - sender, subscriber, and
list admin.)
Brian
>
> On Apr 29, 2017 6:15 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty" <
> kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Apr 29, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
>> brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am I the only IETF list admin who's had to deal with genuine DMARC
>> damage today?
>>
>> No, we had one on the SecDir list as well.
>>
>> Kathleen
>>>
>>> gen-art@xxxxxxxx had four subscriptions suspended for excessive
>> bounces, all caused
>>> by mail from one participant whose sending domain has published a
>> p=reject policy
>>>
>>> Bizarrely, one of the subscriptions disabled was @gmane.org. It's a
>> very strange
>>> choice for them to respect p=reject.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Brian Carpenter
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>