It sounds like there would be benefit to fixing the mailman to not consider policy bounces as unsub worthy, at least.
On Apr 29, 2017 6:15 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty" <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 29, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am I the only IETF list admin who's had to deal with genuine DMARC damage today?
No, we had one on the SecDir list as well.
Kathleen
>
> gen-art@xxxxxxxx had four subscriptions suspended for excessive bounces, all caused
> by mail from one participant whose sending domain has published a p=reject policy
>
> Bizarrely, one of the subscriptions disabled was @gmane.org. It's a very strange
> choice for them to respect p=reject.
>
> Regards
> Brian Carpenter
>
>