Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/27/2017 5:36 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> ...
> So this seems to me to be an argument of principle vs pragmatism, and
> in general pragmatism has served the Internet well so far.
>
> I think pragmatism is what Fred and Brian arguing for. It is certainly
> the general approach that I support.

IMO, 1981bis should limit its advice to behavior in response to ICMPs, e.g.:

   In reaction to a received ICMP message, a node MUST NOT reduce its estimate of the Path MTU below the IPv6
   minimum link MTU.

Doing otherwise presents too big an attack surface.

Any other advice on how an end system manages its idea of MTU or
otherwise overrides the 1981bis computation of path MTU should be
limited to host requirements documents, not this one.

Joe




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]