> Note that, based on discussions in Chicago, the draft will be extended to also > cover TLS associations. So, it may end up on your table again at some point :) :) > >I think the "fingerprint" reference should be moved up to the bullet > >list in section 4, from the bullet list in 5.1 > > I am not sure. The bullet list in section 4 talks about the fingerprint in general, > while the bullet list in 5.1 talks about the fingerprint attribute. Ah, okay. Perhaps some wording can clear that up? Or maybe "fingerprint attribute" and, what, "association fingerprint" ? Thanks for reading.