Chicago is a big city, and the murder rate varies widely between different areas. So, if you do your maths based on the numbers in the areas where IETFers are likely to move around, and the kind of activities IETFers are likely to participate in (much of the violence is related to gang/drug-related activities), I¹m sure the result is going to be even smallerŠ On 05/04/17 08:56, "ietf on behalf of Carsten Bormann" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote: >On Apr 5, 2017, at 01:06, mike stJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> .005 deaths per week per 1000 > >Right, the 270 micromorts per year (~ 5 micromorts per week) you cited >would lead to a ~ 0.5 % chance of anyone of the ~ 1000 IETFers getting >killed ‹ a factor three less than the 1.5 % that my numbers result in, >but not off by a large factor. >(Still, I wonder where that factor three comes from.) > >Luckily, we hit the other 98.5 % this week. > >(I¹m not that worried by the ~ 15 micromorts of risk I personally was >subjected to, given that I spent on the order of 250 microlives for the >time that went into this meeting. >But my wife, who had been planning our wonderful vacation in Colombia >earlier this year, definitely was.) > >Grüße, Carsten >