Does this mean that only middle boxes, not covered by the architecture could insert an extension header for use within the domain?
John
On 3/15/17, 12:21 PM, "ietf on behalf of Tim Chown" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of Tim.Chown@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 16:16, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Stefano,
> On 16/03/2017 04:55, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
> ...
>> In the mean time, I think it is way too premature to come to conclusion on what text should be used for RFC2460bis and I recommend that the current text is left unchanged until we figured out what to do with EH insertion.
>
> I believe that we have figured it out: extension header insertion is harmful to Internet interoperability.
>
> I fully agree with Suresh's understanding of the rough consensus.
I also agree with Suresh’s appraisal.
Tim