Hi, > On 15 Mar 2017, at 16:16, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stefano, > On 16/03/2017 04:55, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote: > ... >> In the mean time, I think it is way too premature to come to conclusion on what text should be used for RFC2460bis and I recommend that the current text is left unchanged until we figured out what to do with EH insertion. > > I believe that we have figured it out: extension header insertion is harmful to Internet interoperability. > > I fully agree with Suresh's understanding of the rough consensus. I also agree with Suresh’s appraisal. Tim