On 2017-03-13 18:54, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
... /me doffs hat I like this change myself. /me dons hat As I recall, the table was removed mostly because the vast majority of implementations did not support any encoding other than UTF-8, and no one (that I recall) reported implementing the detection table. ...
Well, if we allow UTF-16 and UTF-32 - even if we discourage their use - we should say how to detect those...
Alternatively we could forbid them, but that would be a normative change from RFC 7159.
Best regards, Julian