On 2017-03-13 00:07, Elwyn Davies wrote:
(with half a Gen-art hat on...) Does the WG really want to revisit the anguished discussions that resulted in the changes to Section 8.1 of draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis between versions 07 and 08 back in late November 2013? See https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/current/msg02053.html and many, many messages beore this. Cheers, Elwyn
No, but on the other hand, we should acknowledge that apparently the text both about what's mandatory and how auto detection works is not as clear as it should.
Best regards, Julian