Ted, > On Mar 10, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The one thing I wish you'd mentioned in this blog, but did not, is a point someone made earlier on this thread: that the fact that the CIA needs to hack individual devices to bypass end-to-end encryption means that what we are doing in promoting encryption is effective and worth doing: rather than everybody's communications being vulnerable, individuals must now be targeted. I think that’s a good point. To expand what you said, these tools are for targeted attacks, not mass surveillance. Encryption continues to be a strong protection against mass surveillance. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP