On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Fernando Gont wrote: > On 03/07/2017 01:23 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > > On 3/7/17 8:08 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:02:54AM -0500, > >> Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote > >> a message of 54 lines which said: > >> > >>> This is all really good advice. I think it should be published as an > >>> RFC. > >> I suspect we may run into IPR problems. The CIA author did not read > >> the Note Well. > >> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government > > Well... one would still need to assess whether such work is official or > not. :-) At times, intelligence agency's work is not official -- > actually, officially, such work didn't happen. :-) Yeah, leaked classified materials don't need a copyright for protection. One can go to jail with out ever getting a chance to discuss copyright status.