On 2017-03-08 18:13, Matthew Miller wrote:
On 17/03/08 10:08, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2017-03-08 18:02, Matthew Miller wrote:
...
the rationale for referencing third edition specifically is to give
evidence of the JSON's specification history. Maybe the word "update"
is debatable here, but I think the reference itself is valid.
...
Well. In that case, why is the 3rd edition a specifically good one to cite?
Best regards, Julian
Third Edition is where the object literal syntax (from whence JSON was
begotten) made its appearance. Also, the latest editions of ECMA-262
doesn't discuss JSON the data format; that is what (for them) ECMA-404
is for.
OK. A few words about this, either in the place where it's referenced,
or as annotation of the reference, would be helpful.
Best regards, Julian