On 17/03/08 10:08, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2017-03-08 18:02, Matthew Miller wrote: >> ... >> the rationale for referencing third edition specifically is to give >> evidence of the JSON's specification history. Maybe the word "update" >> is debatable here, but I think the reference itself is valid. >> ... > > Well. In that case, why is the 3rd edition a specifically good one to cite? > > Best regards, Julian Third Edition is where the object literal syntax (from whence JSON was begotten) made its appearance. Also, the latest editions of ECMA-262 doesn't discuss JSON the data format; that is what (for them) ECMA-404 is for. - m&m Matthew Miller
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature