On 07/03/17 13:07, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> I checked the SAAG archives, but, unless I'm mistaken, I failed to >> find a technical discussion about the content of the draft or a >> thread about "fairly clear support" to "progressing this draft". > It was entwined a bit with the 3552bis discussion. Don't have time > at the 'mo to dig out references but happy to do that later. > Sorry to not have had time earlier, but the saag threads for this are at [1,2] and a bit of [3]. As I said the meat of this draft was envisaged to be included in a 3552bis, but the latter has so far not progressed. (IOW, one needs to hunt down the discussion a bit, sorry;-) Cheers, S. [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/current/msg07452.html [2] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/current/msg07096.html [3] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/current/msg07117.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature