On 3/6/2017 8:27 AM, Phillip
Hallam-Baker wrote:
FWIW, I have been a proponent of "less is more". The forest of RFCs we publish don't help implementers find what's important, and many often conflict with each other (even within the BCP and standards-track). Documents in last call should, IMO, need sufficient positive support to move forward. Even after a WG has adopted a doc, we should still be able to say "no" to a doc, not just "no objection". Joe |