On 07/03/17 15:58, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:42:57PM +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote: >> It might be interesting to have a wild ideas slot in the form of a series of >> 10 mins >> talks. > > That sounds like a lightning-talks session. I wonder whether the > plenary would be a good venue for that, or whether that would be too > large an audience? We might not have to do it every time, but perhaps > this is a suggestion for the IAB technical plenary program to > consider. What do people think? Not the plenary. Too big an audience for less well developed ideas, and too scary for many presenters. (And, at a plenary, there would always be someone excited by any random talk, so a smaller set of listeners may actually be beneficial for QA reasons.) Yes to the idea that the IAB (or IESG) could try a session like this a couple of times and see how it goes. Put it in a small room during the normal daytime in parallel with other stuff and see what happens. There would need to be a programme ctte or some rules as to how one gets a slot. If the latter, then I don't like FCFS as we'd end up with the same presenters too many times if I know us:-) S. > > A >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature