I have given lightning talks in several W3C plenaries. They are a very good format for getting many ideas across.
It would be a much better use of plenary time than a lot of things we do.
The ideas do not need to be as wild as 'lets re-engineer protocols in the narrow waist'. Or they could be the opposite. We might have someone suggest IPv6 should go on a diet as its waist is not thin enough.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:42:57PM +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> It might be interesting to have a wild ideas slot in the form of a series of
> 10 mins
> talks.
That sounds like a lightning-talks session. I wonder whether the
plenary would be a good venue for that, or whether that would be too
large an audience? We might not have to do it every time, but perhaps
this is a suggestion for the IAB technical plenary program to
consider. What do people think?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx