> > > For the third time in two days I find myself, when asking others for > > > opinionsabout some text, pointing at github commit logs. With the beautiful > > > makefiles we often have, one can't even depend upon having a formatted .txt > > > version there! ... > The details of that discussion probably belong on ietf-and-github@xxxxxxxx, > but I must point out that this way of working *excludes* from the > discussion WG participants who don't grok github. Substantial issues > need to be discussed on the mailing list and substantial (non-typo) > revisions need to be posted as I-Ds. +1 on all points. Additionally, I've observed a seeming reluctance to update drafts for small stuff, independent of the use or non-use of github. Cases where it's actually best to withhold an update are quite rare, so having this practice as a default really needs to go away. Ned