On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Peter Hessler <phessler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As an implementation, OpenBSD will never add such a crazy thing. And > > you know that many other implementations won't do so either. > > > > I strongly oppose this draft. > > Bit late to object to that text now I'm afraid. You are overstepping, Peter's message is submitted well within the proper time window: The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Maintenance WG (6man) to consider the following document: - 'IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture' <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> as Internet Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2017-03-01. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. > A good time to object would have been 19 years ago when the text you > object to became the standard: You realise that new people are born every day, and not everyone who participates in IETF is 50+ years old? Even I were not of legal age 19 years ago. Your comment borders on the verge of discrimation based on age. This violates the fundamentals on which we work together to standardise technologies. Comments which imply "you should've been there" are both demeaning and derogatory to operators who come to IETF to improve the current state of affairs. Kind regards, Job