On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:37:52PM +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Job Snijders <job@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > For the benefit of the working group, what Lorenzo describes is the > > following in linux-lingo: > > [...] > > Actually no, what I was saying was literally to leave the addresses as > /64s and configure the first-hop router to route the /126 to the > prefix. The hosts won't care. And how to protect the interconnection between the first-hop router and the edge-of-your-network? or the edge of the network itself? I suspect this idea is still in a theoretical stage. Can you point me to a RIPE, NANOG or APRICOT talk where this idea is shared in its entirety? Kind regards, Job