At 1:32 PM +0100 2/15/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote:
in issue 8, I propose:
(Look in the edited draft -06g that I attached
some days ago for how the proposal appears in
the text )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Include more fields for attribute registration from 4566bis
Section 6 has the form for attribute
registration by IANA. There are a couple of
fields missing that will be important for use
of the specification in the WebRTC environment.
Include these fields if that is allowable
according to current IANA procedures and if
that does not delay the publication of this
draft. These fields are needed for use of text
media in WebRTC.
Change:
In two locations from:
"Usage Level: media"
to:
"Usage Level: media, dcsa(subprotocol)"
Insert in two locations in the registration forms:
"Mux Category: NORMAL"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I checked in current IANA registrations, and
found that all SDP attribute registrations now
include the "Mux Category".
So, I assume that we are obliged to do so also
and hope that we can agree on that.
As far as I understand the logic, we should specify NORMAL.
This is not required. See the IANA registry at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xhtml.
It is governed by RFC 4566.
As I've written twice before, my concern is that
this suggestion exceeds a simple editorial
change, and therefore may need to be discussed on
the WG list with WG consensus before it can be
adopted. These fields can be added to the
attribute registration later, according to the
rules for the registry
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xhtml).
I saw no trace yet of registrations of "Usage Level: dcsa(subprotocol)"
I would like to get advice from someone with
insight in the SDP attribute registration and
the status of the dsca(subprotocol) value on
how we should proceed in order to get the
dsca(subprotocol) included in a smooth way
without causing exessive delay.
--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Asking if computers can think is like asking if submarines can swim.