Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Feb 14, 2017, at 10:33 AM, otroan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> *If*  you care about packet loss, then your only option is to probe the path with with
>> synthetic data that exactly mimics the live data, or not to probe at all and live
>> with the 1280. As I said 1280 is pretty close to 1496 which is all most networks
>> will give you in practice.
> 
> Yes, but sending at 1280 does not work for IP tunnels. The whole purpose of the minimum MTU was to give space for tunnel headers (1500-1280).

I'm confused by that statement. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7676#section-3.2 indicates that a GRE tunnel on IPv6 and carrying an IPv6 payload works with a PMTU of 1280, and AFAIK it is among the larger tunnel headers. What tunnels does a PMTU of 1280 not work for?




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]